FC
FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP (FSUN)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- EPS beat but top-line (S&P-defined revenue) missed: diluted EPS was $0.83 vs S&P consensus $0.80 (+4%); S&P “Revenue” was $92.4m vs $99.5m consensus (−7%). Company-reported net interest income (NII) was $74.5m and noninterest income $21.7m (total revenue definition used by the company = $96.2m). Drivers: stable NIM (4.07%), modest sequential NII downtick (day count, lower average loans), and mixed fee income (mortgage/MSR headwinds offset by swap/syndication and treasury management) . EPS/Revenue consensus figures marked with * (Values retrieved from S&P Global).
- Balance sheet momentum: loans +6.8% annualized QoQ to $6.48B (C&I +$137m; CRE −$28m), deposits +12.3% annualized to $6.87B; loan-to-deposit ratio improved to 94.3% .
- Credit quality largely benign but one idiosyncratic nonaccrual: net charge-offs 4 bps; NPLs/loans rose to 1.21% due to a single ~$13m C&I credit with cross‑border manufacturing exposure; ACL/loans increased to 1.42% .
- Guidance/tone: maintained mid-single-digit loan/deposit growth; lowered NII guide (average balance dynamics, rate path); lowered expense guide (variable comp tied to lower fee outlook); 2025 efficiency mid‑60s, NCOs high-teens to low‑20s bps; tax rate 20–22% .
- Potential stock catalysts: sustained >4% NIM with improving deposit mix, loan growth outperformance vs peers, and capital strength (CET1 13.26%); offsets include top‑line miss vs S&P “revenue,” higher NPLs from the single credit, and macro/tariff uncertainty .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- NIM durability and healthy spread: NIM held at 4.07% (10 straight quarters ≥4% per management), with deposit costs easing and mix improving (noninterest-bearing 22.9%; CDs expected to decline, growth in MMDA/NIB) .
- Core growth and liquidity: loans +$108m QoQ (C&I-led) and deposits +$202m QoQ; loan-to-deposit ratio improved to 94.3%; wholesale funding reliance down to ~7% .
- Fee momentum in targeted areas: swap/syndication revenues +~$600k QoQ (+111%); treasury management fees increased, consistent with C&I relationship growth .
Quote: “We’re quite pleased with the start for the year… NIM of 4.07% and solid loan and deposit growth…” — CEO Neal Arnold .
What Went Wrong
- Top-line shortfall vs S&P “revenue”: S&P “Revenue” actual $92.4m vs $99.5m consensus (miss), with sequential NII down ~3% (day count, lower average loans) and mixed service fees (lower consumer deposit fees, card volumes, mortgage MSR capitalization) .
- Asset quality optics: NPLs/loans up to 1.21% driven by a single ~$13m C&I credit moved to nonaccrual; management raised full‑year NCO outlook to high‑teens/low‑20s bps (specific reserve established) .
- Lowered NII and expense guides: NII trimmed due to back‑end‑loaded Q1 balances and rate‑path timing; expense guide lowered on softer fee outlook (mortgage, interchange) and variable comp .
Financial Results
Estimates vs Actual (S&P Global)
Notes: Company’s “total revenue” is NII + noninterest income = $96.21m in Q1 2025 (74.48 + 21.73); S&P’s revenue construct differs and is used for estimate comparisons . Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Performance (Income before income taxes basis)
Key KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We… achieved net income of $23.6 million, EPS of $0.83 and a 1.20% ROA… NIM 4.07% and solid loan and deposit growth…” — Neal Arnold, CEO .
- “Loan growth was strong… C&I up; CRE down… deposits up ~$200m; noninterest‑bearing stable at 22.9%; L/D 94.3%...” — Rob Cafera, CFO .
- “Swap and syndication revenues were up about $600,000 (~111%)… treasury management fees grew; consumer deposit service revenues down ~9%; interchange volumes down ~8% QoQ; mortgage revenue down on MSR capitalization/prepay speeds.” — CFO .
- “NPLs rose 13 bps to 1.21% from one larger credit to nonaccrual; 2025 NCOs expected high‑teens to low‑20s bps; specific reserve established.” — CFO .
- On guidance: “We moved expense guide lower… linked to fee guide and macro; mortgage slowdown and lower interchange… NII lower tied to Q1 average balances and rate path.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Expenses and fees linked: Expense guide lowered alongside reduced fee outlook (mortgage, interchange); variable comp avoided pressure .
- Loan growth and competition: C&I pricing “remains strong,” pipeline solid; activity accelerated late in quarter .
- Deposits & NIM: Expect continued mix improvement; pricing competitive; stable NIM; significant SoCal deposit traction already (“couple hundred million”) .
- NII guide lowered: Reflects back‑end‑loaded Q1 loan growth and timing of rate cuts; still mid‑single‑digit NII growth for 2025 .
- M&A: Opportunistic, in‑footprint; unwilling to assume large asset marks that could risk shareholders in current market .
Estimates Context
- EPS beat: $0.83 actual vs $0.797 consensus (+$0.03); revenue (S&P construct) missed: $92.4m actual vs $99.5m consensus (−$7.1m). Company-reported “total revenue” (NII + noninterest income) was $96.2m, reflecting stable NIM and mixed fee trends . Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
- Revisions likely: Modest upward EPS revisions possible from better NIM stability and expense control; revenue models may adjust to reflect S&P’s revenue construct and fee mix, and to incorporate management’s lowered NII and expense guides .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- NIM resilience remains the differentiator: >4% across 10 consecutive quarters, with improving deposit mix and manageable betas underpinning spread defensibility .
- C&I‑led growth with disciplined CRE: C&I expansion in attractive markets, CRE exposure shrinking; regulatory CRE/capital ratio at ~115% supports flexibility .
- Credit manageable despite a lumpy C&I issue: Single nonaccrual drove NPL uptick; NCO guide remains low in absolute terms (high‑teens/low‑20s bps) with specific reserve in place .
- Expense framework tightening: Lowered expense guide offsets fee moderation; efficiency ratio target mid‑60s suggests continued focus on positive operating leverage .
- Southern California build‑out gaining traction: Early deposit wins support medium‑term funding and relationship growth .
- Watch top‑line definitions: S&P “Revenue” miss contrasts with company “total revenue”; model to the S&P construct for beats/misses and the company construct for operating analysis .
- Near‑term trading setup: EPS beat vs consensus and strong capital (CET1 13.26%) vs top‑line miss and NPL uptick; trajectory hinges on deposit-cost discipline, pipeline conversion, and macro/tariff path .
Footnote: Estimates (consensus and S&P revenue actuals) marked with * are Values retrieved from S&P Global.